NURS FPX 6614 Hypo Assessment 2

Assessment 2 : Enhancing Performance as Collaborators in Care Presentation


Capella University

FPX 6614

Professor’s Name 

March, 2024

Enhancing Performance as Collaborators in Care Presentation

Hello, I am Susie, and today I am going to discuss the importance of interprofessional collaboration for the provision of high-quality coordinated care for heart patients. .In the role of a leader within the healthcare practice, a critical aspect of implementing a project involves presenting a comprehensive analysis of the identified gap in practice, emphasizing the crucial significance of interprofessional collaboration for ensuring safe, high-quality coordinated care for heart patients (Brooks et al., 2020). To garner support and understanding from stakeholders, a detailed and cohesive PowerPoint presentation will be developed. This presentation aims to guide the audience through the steps of the project, fostering transparency and positively engaging stakeholders in the proposed changes for the improvement project. Through this approach, the leader seeks to build trust and understanding, laying the foundation for effective interprofessional communications that ultimately contribute to improved health outcomes.


Steps to Improve Inter-professional Collaboration in an Evidence-Based Practice

Navigating the complexities of healthcare improvement projects requires a systematic and collaborative approach. As a leader aiming to enhance interprofessional collaboration for evidence-based practice in population care, it is crucial to meticulously guide stakeholders through a well-defined set of steps. This not only promotes a shared understanding but also lays the groundwork for a comprehensive presentation on the critical importance of collaborative efforts for heart patient care. The following steps offer a detailed roadmap, ensuring that the interprofessional collaboration initiative is strategically planned, effectively communicated, and successfully implemented (Davidson et al., 2022).

  • Needs Assessment

Conducting a thorough analysis of the current state of interprofessional collaboration forms the foundation of improvement efforts. This step involves identifying existing gaps and challenges in delivering high-quality coordinated care for heart patients (Bakerjian & Wasserman, 2023). The needs assessment serves as a diagnostic tool, allowing leaders to pinpoint specific areas for improvement, ensuring that subsequent interventions are precisely tailored to address the identified deficiencies.

  • Stakeholder Engagement

Active involvement of healthcare professionals and support staff is pivotal in building a collaborative mindset. Stakeholder engagement ensures that diverse perspectives are considered, fostering a shared commitment to the common goal of advancing the quality of care. By involving the entire team early in the initiative, leadership can harness collective expertise and align the workforce with the proposed changes, promoting a culture of collaboration.


  • Overview of What Needs to Happen

Providing a comprehensive overview of the necessary interventions and changes is crucial for aligning practices with evidence-based standards. This step serves as a roadmap, detailing the educational, communicative, and structural adjustments required for fostering a collaborative mindset. Offering a clear overview ensures that the entire healthcare team understands the scope and purpose of the collaborative improvement effort.

  • Explanation of the Planning Stages

Breaking down the improvement process into distinct planning stages is essential for a structured and organized approach. This step provides a detailed explanation of the sequence of actions required to fortify interprofessional collaboration systematically. It aids in setting realistic timelines, expectations, and milestones, ensuring that each facet of the collaborative improvement effort is addressed cohesively (Nembhard et al., 2020).

  • Education and Training Initiatives

Equipping healthcare professionals with the requisite skills, knowledge, and attitudes for effective collaboration is integral to the success of improvement initiatives. This step involves the implementation of tailored educational programs and training sessions that empower the team to embrace a collaborative mindset while aligning their practices with evidence-based standards. Education and training initiatives ensure a seamless transition toward evidence-based practices, fostering a culture of continuous improvement. Incorporating these steps in the improvement project ensures a comprehensive approach, laying the groundwork for successful interprofessional collaboration in evidence-based practice for heart patients (Bouton et al., 2023).



In the context of presenting on the critical importance of interprofessional collaboration for heart patient care, it is imperative to acknowledge and articulate the underlying assumptions that shape the gap analysis and subsequent improvement initiatives. Leaders must recognize the assumptions that guide their understanding of the current state of collaboration among healthcare professionals. This might involve assumptions about the existing communication channels, the level of trust among team members, and the overall receptiveness to collaborative practices. Identifying these assumptions is crucial for transparency and ensures that the presentation is grounded in a clear understanding of the situational context.

Insightful Suggestions

Beyond recognizing assumptions, a leader must provide insightful suggestions derived from the gap analysis. These suggestions should not only address identified shortcomings but also propose practical and evidence-based strategies for improvement. For instance, if the analysis reveals a lack of interdisciplinary communication, the leader might suggest implementing regular team meetings, utilizing digital communication tools, or providing training on effective communication strategies (Movsisyan et al., 2020). The goal is to offer actionable insights that align with the identified gaps and facilitate tangible improvements in interprofessional collaboration. These suggestions serve as a bridge between recognizing the existing challenges and steering the team towards meaningful changes that positively impact the delivery of safe, high-quality coordinated care for heart patients.


Educational Services and Resources Selected for the Population

In addressing the critical importance of interprofessional collaboration for heart patient care, the selected educational services and resources encompass distinguished entities such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). These resources serve as foundational pillars for disseminating evidence-based information and guidelines related to heart health (Navar et al., 2022). The CDC offers a plethora of materials, including publications and infographics, while the NHLBI provides comprehensive guidelines on cardiovascular health and treatment modalities (Murriel et al., 2020). The choice of these reputable sources ensures that the educational content is reliable, up-to-date, and aligned with established standards in the field of cardiovascular care.


Comprehensive Information

  • Utilizing a diverse range of CDC resources, including publications, infographics, and educational campaigns, to effectively communicate information about heart disease risk factors, prevention strategies, and disease management.
  • Incorporating guidelines from the NHLBI to provide evidence-based recommendations for cardiovascular health, treatment options, and lifestyle interventions, thereby ensuring a well-rounded and informed approach (Kho et al., 2022).
  • Implementing a multifaceted approach that includes online resources, printed materials, workshops, and interactive sessions to cater to various learning preferences and engage the population more effectively.
  • Tailoring educational content to different health literacy levels within the population, ensuring accessibility and understanding for individuals with diverse literacy backgrounds.
  • Developing materials that are culturally competent, acknowledging and respecting the diversity within the population, fostering inclusivity and relevance.
  • Conducting collaborative workshops that bring together healthcare professionals, patients, and community members to share knowledge and insights, fostering a collective understanding of heart care.


Plans to Collaborate and Partner with Interprofessional Team Members

Creating an effective interprofessional collaboration strategy is paramount for enhancing population health care outcomes within the care coordination process. The implementation process involves a systematic approach that begins with the identification of key stakeholders, including nurses, physicians, allied health staff, and administrative personnel. The initial step is to conduct collaborative needs assessments to understand the unique contributions each professional brings to the table (Schot et al., 2020). This involves recognizing the skills, expertise, and perspectives of team members, fostering a holistic and comprehensive understanding of patient care.

Summarizing the plans to collaborate and partner with interprofessional team members necessitates clear communication channels and regular forums for information exchange.


Implementing interdisciplinary rounds, case conferences, and utilizing digital communication platforms are integral components. Moreover, collaborative decision-making processes will be established to ensure that the expertise of each team member contributes to a well-rounded care coordination process. The summary, tailored to the target audience, emphasizes the importance of interprofessional collaboration in improving heart patient care outcomes. It is supported by credible sources, referencing established models of successful collaboration and the positive impact on patient outcomes. The overall strategy involves fostering a culture of mutual respect, open communication, and shared decision-making (Paschen et al., 2020). By leveraging the strengths of each team member, the interprofessional collaboration aims to create a seamless and patient-centered care coordination process, ultimately leading to safer, higher-quality, and more coordinated care for heart patients.


Outcomes of the New Process for Improved Interprofessional Collaboration

The proposed implementation of an enhanced interprofessional collaboration process aims to bring about significant improvements in patient care outcomes, aligning with the HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) metrics. By fostering positive interprofessional communications, the expectation is to elevate the overall patient experience, as reflected in HCAHPS scores (Aoki et al., 2020). Improved collaboration can lead to better communication, shared decision-making, and a more coordinated approach to care, all of which contribute to higher scores in areas such as nurse communication, physician communication, and care transition. Moreover, the emphasis on collaborative care models is anticipated to reduce medical errors, enhance patient safety, and ultimately contribute to higher scores in domains related to the safety and quality of care.


Underlying Assumptions or Uncertainties

In proposing these outcomes, it is essential to acknowledge the underlying assumptions and uncertainties. The assumption here is that increased interprofessional collaboration will inherently lead to better patient outcomes, yet this process might face challenges in implementation, and its impact might be influenced by various external factors. The uncertainties could revolve around the adaptability of healthcare professionals to new collaborative models and potential resistance to change within the organizational culture. To address these uncertainties, a robust evaluation plan is crucial, encompassing quantitative and qualitative measures. This involves assessing HCAHPS scores, tracking the incidence of medical errors, and obtaining feedback from the interprofessional team and patients (Ellenbogen et al., 2022). Additionally, scholarly evidence supporting the effectiveness of enhanced collaboration models, as well as aligning with the scope and standards of practice for care coordination, will provide a solid foundation for the proposed change, ensuring that it is both evidence-based and ethically sound.


Scope and Standards of Practice for Care Coordination

The implementation of changes in care coordination for heart patients must adhere to the established Scope and Standards of Practice for Care Coordination, ensuring ethical considerations are thoroughly integrated. The scope encompasses a holistic view of care, emphasizing the need for ethical decision-making that prioritizes patient well-being. Ethical considerations involve respecting the autonomy and dignity of patients, ensuring equitable access to services, and promoting patient advocacy. Aligning with these standards is crucial to fostering positive interprofessional collaboration as it establishes a framework for ethical decision-making among team members. The interprofessional team should prioritize transparency and clear communication in implementing these changes, ensuring that every decision is ethically sound and aligns with the overarching goal of providing safe, high-quality coordinated care for heart patients (Bowman et al., 2021).

Incorporating scholarly support is essential to validate the ethical considerations and decisions made in the care coordination process. Scholarly literature can provide evidence-based insights into ethical practices within healthcare, offering a foundation for decision-making that goes beyond anecdotal or subjective judgments. This integration of scholarly support ensures that the ethical considerations are grounded in the broader context of healthcare ethics, reinforcing the credibility and validity of the proposed changes. As the leader in practice presents these ethical considerations, supported by scholarly evidence, stakeholders are more likely to understand the necessity of the proposed changes and appreciate the ethical foundation that guides the improvement project.



In conclusion, the strategic implementation of changes in care coordination for heart patients, guided by a thorough gap analysis and supported by the critical importance of interprofessional collaboration, is pivotal for achieving safe, high-quality, and coordinated healthcare outcomes. By systematically addressing the identified gaps, fostering positive interprofessional communications, and adhering to the Scope and Standards of Practice for Care Coordination, the proposed improvements aim to enhance patient outcomes and promote ethical decision-making. The comprehensive approach outlined in the presentation, from engaging stakeholders to evaluating outcomes and incorporating scholarly evidence, forms a robust foundation for sustainable and effective care coordination. As a leader in practice, navigating through these steps ensures transparency, builds trust, and leads to better health outcomes for heart patients. This research assessment underscores the significance of evidence-based, ethical, and collaborative practices in healthcare, contributing to the ongoing discourse on improving patient care and overall health system effectiveness.



Aoki, T., Yamamoto, Y., & Nakata, T. (2020). Translation, adaptation and validation of the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) for use in Japan. BMJ Open, 10(11), e040240.

Bakerjian, D., & Wasserman, M. (2023). Interdisciplinary care and care coordination. Springer EBooks, 1–17.

Bouton, C., Manon, J., Jourdain, M., Morgane, A., Huon, J., & Rat, C. (2023). Interprofessional collaboration in primary care. BMC Primary Care, 24(1).

Bowman, K. S., Suarez, V. D., & Weiss, M. J. (2021). Standards for interprofessional collaboration in the treatment of individuals with Autism. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(4).

Brooks, E. M., Winship, J. M., & Kuzel, A. J. (2020). A “Behind-the-Scenes” Look at interprofessional care coordination: How person-centered care in safety-net health system complex care clinics produce better outcomes. International Journal of Integrated Care, 20(2).

Davidson, A. R., Kelly, J., Ball, L., Morgan, M., & Reidlinger, D. P. (2022). What do patients experience? Interprofessional collaborative practice for chronic conditions in primary care. BMC Primary Care, 23(1).

Ellenbogen, M. I., Ellenbogen, P. M., Rim, N., & Brotman, D. J. (2022). Characterizing the relationship between hospital google star ratings, hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems (HCAHPS) scores, and quality. Journal of Patient Experience, 9, 237437352210926.

Kho, A. N., Daumit, G. L., Truesdale, K. P., Brown, A. F., Kilbourne, A. M., Ladapo, J. A., Wali, S., Cicutto, L., Matthews, A. K., Smith, J. S., Davis, P., Schoenthaler, A., Gbenga Ogedegbe, Islam, N., Mills, K. L., He, J., Watson, K. S., Winn, R. A., Stevens, J., & Huebschmann, A. G. (2022). The national heart lung and blood institute disparities elimination through coordinated interventions to prevent and control heart and lung disease alliance. Health Services Research, 57(S1), 20–31.

Movsisyan, N. K., Vinciguerra, M., Medina, J. R., & Lopez, F. (2020). Cardiovascular diseases in central and Eastern Europe. Annals of Global Health, 86(1).

Murriel, A. L., Kahin, S., Pejavara, A., & O’Toole, T. (2020). The high obesity program: Overview of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and cooperative extension services efforts to address obesity. Preventing Chronic Disease, 17(25).

Navar, A. M., Fine, L. J., Ambrosius, W. T., Brown, A., Douglas, P. S., Johnson, K., Khera, A. V., Lloyd-Jones, D., Michos, E. D., Mujahid, M., Muñoz, D., Nasir, K., Redmond, N., Ridker, P. M., Robinson, J., Schopfer, D., Tate, D. F., & Lewis, C. E. (2022). Earlier treatment in adults with high lifetime risk of cardiovascular diseases: What prevention trials are feasible and could change clinical practice. American Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 12, 100430.

Nembhard, I. M., Buta, E., Lee, Y. S. H., Anderson, D., Zlateva, I., & Cleary, P. D. (2020). A quasi-experiment assessing the six-months effects of a nurse care coordination program on patient care experiences and clinician teamwork in community health centers. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1).

Paschen, J., Wilson, M., & Ferreira, J. J. (2020). Collaborative intelligence: How human and artificial intelligence create value along the B2B sales funnel. Business Horizons, 63(3).

Schoenthaler, A., Gbenga Ogedegbe, Islam, N., Mills, K. L., He, J., Watson, K. S., Winn, R. A., Stevens, J., & Huebschmann, A. G. (2022). The national heart lung and blood institute disparities elimination through coordinated interventions to prevent and control heart and lung disease alliance. Health Services Research, 57(S1), 20–31.

Schot, E., Tummers, L., & Noordegraaf, M. (2020). Working on working together: A systematic review on how healthcare professionals contribute to interprofessional collaboration. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 34(3), 1–11.



Stuck with your Assessment?

Get in touch today!
Expert Help 24/7

    Table of Contents

    Complete your entire flexpath program in just 1 billing cycle?

    Top-class writers are here!

    NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 4

    Name Capella University FPX6610: Introduction

    NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 3

    Name Capella University FPX6610: Introduction

    NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 2

    Patient Care Plan NURS FPX

    NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 1

    NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 1

    50% OFF!


    Your Journey To Success

    Need Helping Hand?
    We're Here For You