NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing Health Care Issues

NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing Health Care Issues

NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 4

Name: Capella University

Developing a Health Care Perspective

Instructor’s Name

September 2023

Analyzing a Current Health Care Problem

In the complex landscape of healthcare, the issue of medical errors stands as a critical concern with far-reaching consequences (Isaacs et al., 2020). 

Healthcare professionals, institutions, and society at large grapple with the profound impact of these errors on patient safety, well-being, and trust in the healthcare system (Isaacs et al., 2020). 

Addressing this multifaceted problem necessitates a comprehensive analysis, encompassing not only the definition and causes of medical errors but also the consideration of potential solutions and their ethical implications Through this assessment, we embark on a journey to explore the intricate dimensions of the problem of medical errors in healthcare, equipping stakeholders with the knowledge and tools needed to address this issue with ethical rigor and evidence-based strategies.

NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing Health Care Issues

Elements of the Problem

Medical errors represent a critical challenge in contemporary healthcare systems. These errors encompass a wide range of adverse events that occur during the provision of medical care, ranging from diagnostic inaccuracies and medication errors to surgical mistakes (Sadowska, 2019). 

The issue of medical errors is a matter of paramount concern as it not only compromises patient safety but also results in significant financial burdens for healthcare organizations. Addressing this issue requires a comprehensive analysis of its various facets, including the factors contributing to medical errors, the impact on patient outcomes, and the ethical considerations surrounding potential solutions (Sadowska, 2019).

Medical errors are a multifaceted issue in healthcare, stemming from a combination of human factors such as fatigue, cognitive biases, and inadequate training, coupled with systemic challenges like understaffing, inefficient processes, and a lack of standardization. Communication breakdowns among healthcare teams and the increasing complexity of technology and medications also contribute (Carver et al., 2019). 

Patient-related factors, including health literacy and non-adherence, further compound the problem. Recognizing these causes is crucial to developing effective strategies for error prevention that encompass both individual healthcare professionals and systemic improvements within healthcare organizations (Carver et al., 2019).

Assessing Credibility and Relevance of Information Sources

Scholarly information is instrumental in elucidating complex healthcare problems and issues, providing valuable insights and evidence-based perspectives. 

One such critical issue in healthcare is medical errors. A study estimated that medical errors are the third leading cause of death in the United States. This scholarly work helps explain the gravity of the problem by providing a well-documented and statistically supported assessment of its impact on patient outcomes. By analyzing data from multiple sources, the study emphasizes the magnitude of medical errors as a major public health concern, shedding light on the need for robust interventions to mitigate this issue (Atanasov et al., 2020).


The problem of medical errors in healthcare is a pervasive issue characterized by preventable adverse events occurring during the delivery of medical care, resulting in harm to patients. 

These errors can manifest across various facets of healthcare, including misdiagnosis, medication mistakes, surgical errors, communication breakdowns, and healthcare-associated infections (Manias et al., 2020). Patients, who entrust their well-being to the healthcare system, bear the brunt of these errors. The gravity of the issue lies not only in the immediate harm caused but also in the erosion of patient trust in the healthcare system (Manias et al., 2020).

Stakeholders Involved

The landscape of medical errors within the healthcare ecosystem involves a myriad of stakeholders, each wielding a distinct influence on the issue’s dynamics. At the forefront are healthcare professionals, including physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and ancillary staff, who are entrusted with the direct provision of patient care (Isaacs et al., 2020). 

Their clinical expertise, decisions, and actions significantly impact the occurrence and prevention of medical errors. Simultaneously, patients, as the recipients of healthcare services, occupy a central position in this narrative. They bear the direct consequences of errors and their perspectives are invaluable for comprehending the problem from a humanistic standpoint, as well as for advocating for enhanced safety measures. 

Healthcare organizations, comprising hospitals, clinics, and medical facilities, are accountable for fostering an environment conducive to patient well-being (Isaacs et al., 2020). They are pivotal in crafting and enforcing protocols, providing training, and implementing safety mechanisms aimed at minimizing errors. 

Regulatory bodies, such as the FDA and CMS, exert significant influence by virtue of their role in healthcare oversight and policy-making, which encompasses setting and enforcing standards designed to ensure patient safety. Additionally, the research community and academia contribute to this discourse by investigating the causes and ramifications of medical errors, furnishing empirical evidence and evidence-based strategies to combat the issue (Isaacs et al., 2020).

NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing Health Care Issues

Causes of the Problem

The etiology of medical errors within the healthcare milieu is a multifaceted phenomenon, stemming from an intricate interplay of systemic, human, and organizational factors. Human factors encompass elements such as provider fatigue, cognitive biases, and inadequate training, which can predispose healthcare professionals to errors in diagnosis, treatment, and medication administration (Carver et al., 2019). System-related issues, including understaffing, inefficiencies in processes, and the absence of standardization within healthcare organizations, forge an environment conducive to errors. 

Communication breakdowns among healthcare team members, particularly during transitions of care, can engender misunderstandings and mistakes (Carver et al., 2019). The integration of complex healthcare technologies and electronic health records may introduce data entry errors, while the intricate nature of medication regimens and the prevalence of similarly named medications contribute to medication errors. Additionally, patient-related factors, such as limited health literacy and non-adherence to prescribed treatments, pose additional layers of complexity, further exacerbating the problem (Carver et al., 2019).

Considering Options

Addressing the problem of medical errors in healthcare requires a systematic evaluation of potential strategies. One option involves the implementation of robust patient safety protocols and error-reporting systems within healthcare organizations. These systems encourage healthcare professionals to report errors and near misses, fostering a culture of transparency that allows for the identification of systemic weaknesses (Manias et al., 2020). 

Additionally, the adoption of evidence-based clinical guidelines and best practices can standardize care processes, reducing variations and the likelihood of errors (Manias et al., 2020). This technological advancement, when coupled with improved staff training, can substantially mitigate the risk of errors related to medications. Furthermore, investing in communication and teamwork training programs can enhance intra-team collaboration, reducing the occurrence of errors arising from miscommunication (Manias et al., 2020).

Another critical avenue involves addressing the ethical dimensions of the problem. A potential option here is to prioritize the principle of patient autonomy by promoting error disclosure to affected patients (Grossman et al., 2020). 

Open and honest communication regarding errors, while emotionally challenging, aligns with ethical imperatives and can help rebuild patient trust. Ethical considerations also extend to the allocation of resources for error prevention. Balancing the financial sustainability of healthcare institutions with investments in patient safety measures is a complex ethical challenge that requires careful deliberation (Grossman et al., 2020).


To address the problem of medical errors in healthcare effectively, several potential solutions should be considered. One pivotal strategy involves the establishment of robust error-reporting systems within healthcare organizations. These systems should incentivize healthcare professionals to report errors and near misses without fear of reprisal, thereby cultivating a culture of transparency (Rodziewicz & Hipskind, 2020). A transparent environment is instrumental in identifying systemic weaknesses and recurring error patterns, which can serve as the foundation for targeted improvements. 

Simultaneously, the standardization of care processes through the adoption of evidence-based clinical guidelines and best practices is essential. These guidelines should encompass various aspects of patient care, including diagnostic procedures, medication administration, and surgical protocols, reducing variations in clinical practice and minimizing the likelihood of errors (Rodziewicz & Hipskind, 2020).

Leveraging technology also offers promising solutions to mitigate medical errors. Electronic health records (EHRs) equipped with barcode scanning systems and automated medication dispensing can substantially diminish medication-related errors by ensuring accuracy in drug administration (Gates et al., 2020). Furthermore, EHRs facilitate streamlined communication and information sharing among healthcare providers, enhancing the coordination and quality of patient care. 

Investing in ongoing professional development and training for healthcare professionals is indispensable, encompassing error prevention training, communication skills enhancement, and teamwork training programs (Gates et al., 2020). These initiatives foster a culture of continuous learning and collaboration, equipping healthcare professionals with the skills necessary to prevent errors and respond effectively when they occur.

Consequences of Ignoring the Issue

Ignoring the issue of medical errors in healthcare can have severe consequences for patients, healthcare organizations, and society as a whole. Patients may continue to suffer harm, including misdiagnoses, medication-related injuries, surgical mistakes, and delayed or inadequate care (Isaacs et al., 2020). This can lead to worsened health conditions, prolonged hospital stays, and even fatalities.

Healthcare organizations that neglect to address medical errors risk financial repercussions through increased healthcare costs and potential legal liabilities. Moreover, ignoring the issue erodes patient trust in the healthcare system, resulting in decreased patient satisfaction and potential healthcare disparities. From a societal perspective, a failure to address medical errors perpetuates a public health crisis, as the issue remains a significant contributor to patient morbidity and mortality (Isaacs et al., 2020).

Ethical Implications

Patient Autonomy

Implementing potential solutions to address the issue of medical errors in healthcare necessitates a conscientious consideration of ethical principles. One paramount ethical principle is autonomy, emphasizing the respect for patients’ self-determination and their right to make informed decisions about their healthcare (Kalra et al., 2022). Patients who were informed of medical errors and received apologies were more likely to trust their healthcare providers, underscoring the vital role of autonomy in patient-physician relationships (Kalra et al., 2022).

Beneficence in Healthcare

Additionally, the principle of beneficence, which obliges healthcare professionals to act in the best interests of patients, guides the implementation of error prevention strategies. This ethical commitment to patient well-being is exemplified by the use of standardized clinical guidelines (Kalra et al., 2022). By adhering to these guidelines, healthcare providers fulfill their ethical obligation to maximize benefits and minimize harm.

Non-Maleficence and Justice

The ethical principle of non-maleficence, rooted in the obligation to “do no harm,” drives interventions aimed at minimizing the risk of medical errors. Technology-driven solutions, such as barcode scanning systems in medication administration, are emblematic of this principle (Kalra et al., 2022). By adopting barcode technologies, healthcare organizations uphold the ethical principle of non-maleficence by actively working to mitigate harm to patients. Lastly, the ethical principle of justice, emphasizing the equitable distribution of healthcare resources and benefits, poses dilemmas in resource allocation for error prevention (Kalra et al., 2022).

NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing Health Care Issues


In conclusion, the issue of medical errors in healthcare is a multifaceted challenge with profound consequences for patient safety and trust in the healthcare system. This comprehensive assessment has illuminated the problem’s complexity, exploring its definition, the diverse array of stakeholders involved, and the intricate causes that underlie it. 

By considering a range of potential solutions grounded in ethical principles and supported by empirical research, the assessment provided a roadmap for addressing this issue. The path forward involves fostering a culture of transparency, implementing evidence-based practices, harnessing technology, and empowering patients to actively engage in their healthcare. Through these efforts, we aim to enhance patient safety, rebuild trust, and work collectively to reduce the occurrence of medical errors in healthcare while upholding the integrity of the healthcare system.


Atanasov, A. G., Yeung, A. W. K., Klager, E., Eibensteiner, F., Schaden, E., Kletecka-Pulker, M., & Willschke, H. (2020). First, do no harm (gone wrong): Total-scale analysis of medical errors scientific literature. Frontiers in Public Health, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.558913

Carver, N., Hipskind, J. E., & Gupta, V. (2019, April 28). Medical error. Nih.gov; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430763/

Gates, P. J., Hardie, R.-A., Raban, M. Z., Li, L., & Westbrook, J. I. (2020). How effective are electronic medication systems in reducing medication error rates and associated harm among hospital inpatients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 28(1), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa230

Grossman, S. A., Gurley, K. L., & Wolfe, R. E. (2020). The ethics of error in medicine. Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal, 11(4), e0033. https://doi.org/10.5041/rmmj.10406

Isaacs, A. N., Ch’ng, K., Delhiwale, N., Taylor, K., Kent, B., & Raymond, A. (2020). Hospital medication errors: A cross sectional study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaa136

Kalra, J., Zoher Rafid-Hamed, Wiebe, L., & Seitzinger, P. (2022). Medical error disclosure: A quality perspective and ethical dilemma in healthcare delivery. AHFE International, 10. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002107

Manias, E., Kusljic, S., & Wu, A. (2020). Interventions to reduce medication errors in adult medical and surgical settings: A systematic review. Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety, 11(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098620968309

Rodziewicz, T., & Hipskind, J. (2020). Medical error prevention (pp. 1–37). http://www.saludinfantil.org/Postgrado_Pediatria/Pediatria_Integral/papers/Medical%20Error%20Prevention%20-%20StatPearls%20-%20NCBI%20Bookshelf.pdf

Sadowska, M. (2019). Medical errors and their consequences for human life and health. Studia Iuridica Toruniensia, 22, 321. https://doi.org/10.12775/sit.2018.017

NURS FPX 4000 Assessment 4 Analyzing Health Care Issues


Stuck with your Assessment?
Capella flexpath

    Timely Delivery


    No Plagiarism


    Free Revision

    Get this paper freshly written With 0% plagrism ready to submit For

    $150 - $50

    hire writer
    Place your order
    Please share all the specifics about your tasks and indicate your deadline.
    Get your work Done
    We’ll deliver your work with in 24 hours for your to review.
    Revisions and feedback
    You can provide fееdback and request revisions as nееdеd.

    Get our free sample papers or connect directly with our expert tutors and writers for personalized assistance

    Capella Flexpath

    50% OFF!


      Scroll to Top

      Get Your Written FPX Assessments Within 24 Hours
      Enjoy Upto 50% OFF On First Order

        Verification required to avoid bots.